One of the downsides of not having an salary is that my high-tech gadget purchases have to be heavily curtailed. That doesn’t mean I have to give up on gadget reviews entirely… I just need to adjust my expectations.
One of the errands I ran the other day was to visit the company that was recommended to me when I complained about a lack of mops for people of my stature.
This is a review of the cleaning system that I selected. My review criteria are based on a typical residential household where the floor cleaning is performed by a 5’11” male, with a history of minor back problems and who likes to juggle. Commercial cleaners would be better suited looking at the latest review round-up in Mop & Bucket Quarterly.
I looked at the ready-made mops available – particularly the sponge-based system that I was familiar with – but they all exhibited the same short-handle mis-feature as my existing mop system.
Therefore, I decided to evaluate a custom-made mop solution.
I based my choice on the Sabco Commercial 1.5m Aluminium handle. I selected this model largely based on the fact it was the only long handle in stock. Fortunately, it came with red trim, so I did not need to have another one custom-ordered.
The handle was long and smooth, and fairly light but sturdy. It came with the standard screw-tip. In the test bathroom, there were no low light fixtures or other fragile items, but care should be taken with the longer poles, that items are not accidentally whacked.
As a balancing pole for juggling tricks, it is not ideal. The length is great, but its low moment of inertia and low centre of gravity require rapid movements to maintain the balance.
Of course, custom-length poles do not come fitted with the necessary sliding handle required for sponge-based mop technologies. I was forced to purchase an appropriate yarn-based mop head, compatible with the pole.
Fortunately, the salesman at Enviro Chemicals came to my aid, and quickly selected the Sabco Commercial Premium Grade 400g Contractor Mop Head. This is a Premium Textile Blend, Washable, Highly Absorbent product with Long Lasting Industrial Quality.
It also came in red. Matching the head to the handle meant that I was adhering to one of the “standard health industry colours to reduce the risk of cross contamination”.
When removed from the packaging, the mop head was soft and very warm to touch. (Having left it in the boot of my car on a hot day was probably the cause of at least part of this effect.) I don’t know if it was still warm to touch after I used it; it was all icky, and I wasn’t going to touch it just for this review.
When combined with the mop handle (a simple screw-in operation) the mop became far more suitable for balancing tricks – with additional weight and a much higher centre of gravity. However, the icky factor makes it more of a speciality prop for danger acts than a prop suitable for daily training.
One of the advantages of the yarn-based mops is their longevity. The salesman was adamant that this mop was a quality product that would last a long time. However, given that sponge mops are about half of the price, and probably last 10 years, the Net Present Value of both systems is about the same.
The packaging for the mop head also included:
- an adaptor for “25mm wooden, metal or aluminium handles” – I am relieved that is supports both metal and aluminium handles.
- a spare “innovative non-scratch scourer” pad that attaches to the side of the mop head to help remove “tough stains or marks”.
The spare scourer pad actually posed several problems; where can I store it so I will be able to find it again in a few years’ time, and so that I won’t accidentally throw it out when I can’t recognise what it is? Also, doesn’t the fact that it needs a spare suggest that it doesn’t have a long life? It undermines the longevity argument.
Of course, yarn-based mop heads, unlike sponge mops, require bucket-fitted, head-squeezing technology. The salesman recommended the Edco 16L Plastic Bucket with Metal Mechanism. This is a traditional cylindrical bucket, as opposed to the oblong buckets now offered by their competitors, but it comes fitted with castor wheels.
The selected model was, of course, bright red, to complete the matched look.
The Edco bucket has its foot pedals (to operate the head-squeezing mechanism) quite far apart, which may make the operation difficult for people with short legs. Fortunately, I don’t really give a damn about those preta-porter mop-buying losers.
The lab-testing did not include capacity testing; we only have Edco’s word on the fact that it is indeed 16L. However, testing did confirm that the Edco bucket did not have a hole in it and therefore avoided stack-overflow conditions, dear Lisa.
The downside to the Edco bucket was its price – retailing at $45. When I expressed my concern at the price, the salesman dropped the price by 4%, meaning it only cost 4243% more than the last bucket I purchased. He also threw in a sample bottle of HypoKlean cleaning product (valued at $1, review to follow).
Note: Unlike lower-priced buckets, the Edco bucket is not suitable as an ad hoc and effective blindfold that audience members will actually trust. Fortunately, the aperture of the head-squeezing mechanism is so small that accidents related to its misuse in this way are very low. Nonetheless, I recommend that the existing warning decals (“WARNING: WET FLOOR”) should be supplemented with advice that it is not to be worn as headgear.
The overall cleaning solution was very effective; the mop-head provided a large cleaning surface, meaning less strokes were required. The long handle was very successful in ensuring that my back was straight during the mop-deployment – I felt no adverse effects.
At $65 for the complete system, I did feel like I had overpaid for a replacement to my $10 sponge-mop, but I hope that the future years of service, faster mopping time, plus the reduction in back-pain (not to mention the sheer joy of custom-mopping) should make this purchase one that I look back on fondly.
I haven’t merely bought a mop; I have bought a hygienic heirloom for my tallest heir.
Comment by Mr Rohan on September 25, 2008
What sort of floors is this solution for?
I’m sure your guy told you but there are different detergents for different surfaces ..
Comment by Aristotle Pagaltzis on September 25, 2008
1,000 words about a bunch of mopping utensils (that I read with the expectation of some kind of punchline that never happened). Wow.
Comment by Chris on September 25, 2008
To help with your back problems I propose an extreme food-juggling club meet in your bathroom once a fortnight. BYO eggs, flour bags, cream pies, ripe tomatoes, chainsaws, bowling balls and kittens.
You simply provide the venue and a means to clean up the inevitable mess!
Comment by Richard Atkins on September 28, 2008
Chris, that’s just silly: who’s gonna call a chainsaw food? Bowling balls on the otherhand – they’re delicious!
Julian, are you going to buy matching red overalls to complete the ensemble?
Comment by Julian on October 1, 2008
Mr Rohan,
Tiles and lino; but you are talking about the detergent rather than the mop. HypoKlean was recommended for both the tiles and for the shower screen.
Comment by Julian on October 1, 2008
Richard,
Yes! Yes! Brilliant! I want to look like a Mario Brother when I clean my floors!
Comment by Julian on October 1, 2008
I got a few other reactions to this post, which I found interesting.
John (quite fairly) took me to task about the number of typos, suggesting it looked like it was written in a hurry. He is right; this post was written early and scheduled to appear later, to gently disguise the fact I was on an interstate trip for nine days. I have made a few corrections.
Based on Aristotle’s comment, it sounds like I need to ramble less, and humour more. I think spending more time on it would have achieved both of those goals.
Another friend told me personally (and unprovoked) that he really liked my latest article on “brooms”, which left me unsure about whether to feel good or bad!
I’ve also tried telling people personally how excited I am by my new mop purchase. They invariably change the topic of the conversation immediately!
Comment by Cassie on October 13, 2008
I rather enjoyed this read – it had much more heart than the usual articles I read in my mop and bucket quarterly subscription. I think you should make a submission to the mag, maybe even become a regular contributor. This is the kind of thing that would appeal to the mopping hobbyist, and I suppose even the commercial cleaner that likes to take pride in their work.
Comment by Julian on November 13, 2010
Two year follow-up:
The mop has continued to give my back some relief and my face a little smile every time I clean.
The bucket did require some WD40 lubricant when the mechanism got sticky.
However, today the “innovative non-scratch scourer” had a complete failure, as the glue attaching the scourer to the nylon base gave way. As I predicted two years ago, I have no idea where the spare one is.
Comment by Andrew on November 13, 2010
I guess you should have included a message from the Julian of 2008, to any Julian of the future who is trying to repair his scourer, telling him where the spare part is.
I bet that information would be easier to forget than doctest considered harmful.
What else are blogs for?
Comment by Julian on November 14, 2010
Thanks Andrew, good idea. It is the perfect use for the blog, and I shall start immediately:
The car-keys are on the bedside table.