“But, Julian,” I hear you ask, “What words in the English language have the most anagrams?”
Well, based on a English dictionary I found on my computer, there are two sets: TEARS and PEARS.
Here they are, for each word-length:
Len | Count | Anagrams |
---|---|---|
3 | 5 | ETA, TAE, ATE, EAT, TEA |
4 | 9 | TAES, SETA, ETAS, TEAS, EATS, SEAT, SATE, ATES, EAST |
5 | 13 | EARST, REAST, STEAR, STARE, TARES, RESAT, ASTER, TASER, TERAS, TEARS, ARETS, RATES, STRAE |
PARES, SPEAR, PRESA, PEARS, PARSE, RAPES, PRASE, SPARE, SPAER, ASPER, APERS, APRES, REAPS | ||
6 | 12 | ARTELS, TARSEL, STALER, ALERTS, ESTRAL, SALTER, TALERS, STELAR, SLATER, LASTER, ALTERS, RATELS |
7 | 11 | GAINEST, SEATING, TSIGANE, TEASING, TAGINES, INGATES, TANGIES, EATINGS, EASTING, GENISTA, INGESTA |
RETSINA, RETAINS, STARNIE, NASTIER, STEARIN, RETINAS, RESIANT, ANESTRI, RATINES, STAINER, ANTSIER | ||
8 | 11 | GRANITES, TASERING, GANISTER, ASTRINGE, ANGRIEST, INGRATES, GANTRIES, ANGSTIER, REASTING, STEARING, RANGIEST |
9 | 6 | ITERANCES, CENTIARES, CISTERNAE, NECTARIES, CREATINES, ENCRATIES |
10 | 5 | RECAUTIONS, CAUTIONERS, NOCTUARIES, COINTREAUS, RECUSATION |
POTTINGERS, POTTERINGS, REPOTTINGS, RESPOTTING, PROTESTING | ||
11 | 6 | MISCREATION, REACTIONISM, ANISOMETRIC, ROMANICITES, CREATIONISM, ROMANTICISE |
12 | 4 | REACTIONISMS, CREATIONISMS, MISCREATIONS, ROMANTICISES |
NEPHROLOGIES, PIGEONHOLERS, PHRENOLOGISE, PHRENOLOGIES | ||
13 | 3 | ELECTRISATION, ACETONITRILES, INTERSOCIETAL |
ACCOUTREMENTS, ACCOUTERMENTS, ACCOUSTREMENT | ||
14 | 3 | INDISCRETENESS, INDIRECTNESSES, INDISCREETNESS |
15 | 4 | PHONOGRAMICALLY, GRAMOPHONICALLY, MONOGRAPHICALLY, NOMOGRAPHICALLY |
I hope that answers your question satisfactorily. You’re welcome.
Comment by David Shaw on September 23, 2012
You only answered some of my questions. How did you come up with the list? A web page somewhere? Or did you write some code to process your dictionary? If so, let’s see it.
Comment by Julian on September 23, 2012
I wrote some Python code. I didn’t think it was particularly exciting, but here it is:
Comment by Aristotle Pagaltzis on September 24, 2012
The table would also be more useful if it included the count of anagrams for each of the words.
Comment by Julian on November 8, 2012
Aristotle, finally done.
Comment by Aristotle Pagaltzis on November 14, 2012
🙂
Nice.